Home | News | Products | Support | Download | Sales | library | Guests | Contact | WebCam | Links
CDS Logo LanBox-Talk mail archive
 

By date: Prev | Next | Index By thread: Prev | Next | Index

SubjectRe: [LCtalk] Wing / programmable keys
FromJason Brameld
DateFri, 15 Jun 2007 09:28:34 +0300


When used properly this is indeed a big enhancement, when the jogwheel is assigned to the arrow keys it makes it ideal for positioning movingheads and setting statics. And in combination with the shift key it speeds it up as it would with normal arrow keys.
With the arrow keys assigned to the jogwheel it also makes it a lot easier to scroll through long lists (as the mouse scrollwheel doesn't work in LCedit)

I really like this idea


The only mistake I made was to create the macro's using the Xkeys program, instead of creating macro's in LCedit and assigning them to a key. I ended up with long keystrokes in the xkeys program with a few going wrong causing an exeptional error in LCedit, not nice!
I worked around those 'wrong keys' during the show so everything went well. For the futur I know now to use LCedit more instead of the Xkeys keystrokes.


What I found to be a boundary in this setup is a short-key to things in the advanced panel, for example to manually set the transparency I needed to use the mouse to click the field first, and than jog to the wanted position.

Maybe some consideration could be given to expanding the keyboard shortcuts in future versions to make this more powerful - If this included some degree of 'standardisation' of presents for moving lights, colours , position, gobos etc in the definition files then you could end up with something that is as powerful as a hog or Strand 520 (which the lanbox is - almost) and as easy to use (which the lanbox certainly isn't).



Live I had the frontlights under a key so I could manually set the frontlights as needed. I made it to select the frontlights layer and select the fixtures acordingly. So one press on a button and I could immediatly jog to the desired value.

I think there is much more conveniance with this.
Does anyone use a similar setup, and if so, how do you use it?

I would be very interested to hear of anyone else who has tried this, and how they got on.


Jason

By date: Prev | Next | Index By thread: Prev | Next | Index