| Home | News | Products | Support | Download | Sales | library | Guests | Contact | WebCam | Links | |
| LanBox-Talk mail archive | |
| By date: Prev | Next | Index | By thread: Prev | Next | Index | ||||||
Just to add my opinion to the current threads about the Lanbox functionality and manuals etc. I think the functionality of the product is great. It can deal with almost anything DMX-Wise, and has a wide variety of methonds for running shows on external trigger, contacts, Midi, by keyboard etc etc. I have done 2 shows with my LCX, a year apart, and each time I have discovered new stuff that improves my view on the functionality of the box. It is far from being an unfinished product. I would also say however, that I also discover new frustrations every time I use it, and I don't find the documentation very helpful. I often go back through the tutorial and the reference guide, and the hardware manual to find something out and just don't find it easy or intuitive. The support is great however, and often once it has been explained differently you can go back to the manual and understand it in there, but that isn't the way round it should be. I tried to do another show with it where I wanted to use another desk to plot the conventional fixtures and capture these values into LC-Edit, and plot the movers and colour changers directly with LC-Edit. I failed to get the DMX in working until I could get the missing bit of info from support, by which time I had abandoned the use of the box and gone back to a conventional desk. I now know how to to this for the future but it was very frustrating at the time. LC Edit is great for doing visual-based editing of cues with the stage layout etc etc. It has done some strange things though, and if you don't get the concept of how the layers work then you won't get very far. Once you do understand it though, a whole world of possibilities and complexities open up, not all of which I would yet claim to be able to understand. I also find the fixture editor frustrating, although I have mostly managed to achieve what I need each time - mostly by trial and error though. As with any very complex product or software package, it needs time spent on it to develop an understanding of the fundamentals, and also to just play around outside of the pressures of the show environment. This is where some of my understanding has come from (it generally doesn't come from the manuals!). It is well worth investing this time. I doubt if you stuck me in front of a Jands, Compulite or Strand high-end console I would get going in no time. It is true that some software is more intuitive than other software, and LC-Edit is not the most intuitive package I have ever come across. The windows version also suffers a bit from being a Mac import and based around Mac keystrokes which are less intuitive for windows users. At some point I plan to jot down some more comments on the software, having recently done another reasonably-sized show with it. Until then, I remain of the view that it is a very powerful product with not-so good documentation and frustrating, but ultimately very capable software. Improved documentation would certainly help, and I also think some kind of training course would be of great benefit. Having a few key people factory-trained and able to offer local training services and support at all levels would be very valuable in my view. Regards, Jason Brameld Senior Consultant MJC Tel: +44 1628 604411 Mobile: +44 7973 234075
| |||||||
| By date: Prev | Next | Index | By thread: Prev | Next | Index | ||||||