| Home | News | Products | Support | Download | Sales | library | Guests | Contact | WebCam | Links | |
| LanBox-Talk mail archive | |
| By date: Prev | Next | Index | By thread: Prev | Next | Index | ||||||
Hi everybody,
i do light works and other things mostly related to dance and performance in the 'free' scene. i am touring a lot as well. i bought a lcx a couple of month ago and i used it already for three different shows in very different circumstances. no problems at all when i got past the step of understanding - partly - the logics of lc edit. plus i started to use the lanbox with midi triggering through digital performer and pure data. again all went smooth - after the first unavoidable struggles - and we now have a system where sound, light and video can be synchronised with pd. i agree that the manuals can be confusing but the mailing list is very rich of information and the presence of fokko and matthijs a.o. is quite amazing. i used to have to work on a different console in each venue where i had my shows. had by the way quite funny experiences in some places in eastern europe where dmx is still a dream. that means that to a certain extend i am able to deal with most of the current consoles around, but that i used to get a chance to handle them only on the spot - in the theater. what i find a positive thing with the lanbox, already that early in the process, is that i can develop my own way of dealing with it, continuously in time, independently somehow of the time spent in theaters. i also think that lcedit is not such a bad tool for previsualisation of what will happen onstage - no 3d simulation there but when one is serious in building the stage window and has a capacity for abstraction it works pretty well. i could quite easily (this involving a good communication with the venue about lightplot and patch) pre-programm some shows and just have to do corrections on the spot.
cheers bruno
| |||||||
| By date: Prev | Next | Index | By thread: Prev | Next | Index | ||||||